- Business
- Local/State
- Nation/World
- Sports
- Top Stories
- Duke
- NCCU
- UNC
- NCSU
- College
- High School
- Canes
- Durham Bulls
- Pro Sports
- Golf
- Tennis
- Auto Racing
- Soccer
- Columnists
- Lifestyles
- Announcements
- Books
- Schools
- Health
- Food
- Faith
- Entertainment
- TV
- Columnists
- Special Sections
- Senior Times
Candidate jousting marks NCCU forum
gronberg@heraldsun.com; 419-6648
DURHAM -- Candidates, challengers and audience members sparred Tuesday about whether the City Council is doing enough to help Durham's inner-city neighborhoods, with complaints about recreation programs and street work taking center stage.
The exchange at an N.C. Central University forum produced a spirited defense of the city's work from Mayor Bill Bell, who said city foot-dragging about whether to build a new recreation center in the Walltown neighborhood ended on his watch.
It also saw Bell, Ward 1 incumbent Cora Cole-McFadden and Ward 3 incumbent Mike Woodard lock horns with former Councilwoman Jackie Wagstaff -- the mother of Ward 1 challenger Donald Hughes -- about why street and sidewalk repairs along Fayetteville Street aren't further along.
Wagstaff said conditions in the corridor are "nothing to be proud about" when compared to those in other Triangle college commercial districts like Ninth Street in Durham, Franklin Street in Chapel Hill and Hillsborough Street in Raleigh.
But Cole-McFadden said the council has been busy trying to fix "a lot of stuff that happened before" she and Bell took office in 2001. Cole-McFadden beat Wagstaff in that year's Ward 1 election.
Woodard added that the council convinced voters to pass big street bonds in the 2005 and 2007 elections, and is now using the money to catch up on paving work that was neglected in the late 1990s.
"What did the prior council do?" Cole-McFadden said, referring to the group Wagstaff served with.
"It never came before us," Wagstaff answered. "We were too busy trying to take care of the 'hood."
Bell, meanwhile, said the city is assembling plans for a larger renovation of the Fayetteville Street corridor's streetscape. He also took credit for recruiting, before he became mayor, the Food Lion grocery that serves the neighborhood.
He added that community rehabilitation efforts always have a long lead time, and that challengers have the luxury of crying doom and gloom.
"These guys will tell you anything, because they haven't been there, and they haven't done that," Bell said, making it clear he was taking in all three council challengers and mayoral candidate Steven Williams.
Hughes accused the council of do-nothingism. "A combined 45 years of experience, and all the mayor can say is we'll just wait and see," he said. "We need new leadership for Durham."
Williams, a Walltown native, said the city's former reluctance to build the recreation center probably cost lives. "I lost a lot of people in Walltown because we didn't have a community center, to crime, death and murder."
He also joined audience member Anita Keith-Foust in criticizing the council for spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to build the new skateboard park near Durham Central Park.
But Woodard and Ward 2 incumbent Howard Clement joined Cole-McFadden in noting that plans for the skateboard process grew out of lobbying by Durham youth. Woodard also joined Bell in saying the current council had stepped up on Walltown.
He noted he and other members of a citizen panel that shaped the city's 2005 bond package that included the Walltown center "over the objections" of many of their colleagues. They also earmarked money for the conversion of the former Holton Middle School, off Driver Street, into a combination vocational school, clinic and recreation center.
Ward 2 challenger Matt Drew and Ward 3 challenger Allan Polak had rough nights, mostly due to the audience.
Drew didn't answer to audience members' satisfaction when candidates were asked what they'd do to promote volunteerism by N.C. Central students. "Why are you waiting for the City Council to get you involved?" he asked. He added later that the council should scale back spending on non-essentials and focus its spending on core services like street paving.
The comments drew a rebuke from Keith-Foust. "That's not the right message for this audience," she told them. "You're saying the wrong stuff to us. We don't like it. Please stop it."
Polak as he has in a previous forum criticized Woodard for serving on the council while also working as an administrator at Duke University.


At last night's candidate forum and while writing "Lone candidate stands for right to life and traditional marriage at Durham forum" (http://www.aipnews.com/talk/forums/thread-view.asp?tid=8949) I sought to gather and share information fairly and accurately. While recognizing that the impossibility of being totally impartial on topics that I feeling strongly about, I tried to be impassive. I wrote the news story. I went to bed. I wept.
I don't know the candidates personally to any depth, but I have met, talked with, and listened to each of the candidates. They all impress me as individuals who sincerely want the betterment of Durham.
Although my wife and I have done volunteer work in Durham, I have no doubt that every one of the candidates has outdone me in volunteerism and service to the community. One of Cora Cole-McFadden's supporters who has epilepsy and no health insurance told me how Cora used her own resources to get her needed medication. Through a mutual acquaintance I know of Bill Bell's personal commitment to the Star Foundation and its work in helping at-risk youths in Durham. Howard Clement spoke eloquently last night of the need for more African American men to serve as mentors of black youths.
It seems that all of the candidates in one way or another want to help the less fortunate and "bind up the injured and strengthen the weak" as the prophet Ezekiel was inspired to write (Ezek. 34:16). Yet when it comes to the weakest, most helpless, most innocent among us, only one candidate out of the eight currently running for public office in Durham is willing to take a stand for preborn babies' God-given right to life the entire pregnancy. Only two of the candidates are willing to acknowledge that a right to life even exists before birth.
I am encouraged by the candidates who support the right to life. I am deeply saddened by those who don't. The Culture of Death is a modern-day reality in 21st Century America. It is also a tragedy.
We are not living in an age of ignorance about human reproduction. When fertilization occurs, a new human being is created. Of the more than 1,000 preborn babies killed each year in Durham, each tiny boy or girl has a beating heart, brain waves, and his or her own blood supply separate from the mother's. These are human beings guilty of nothing more than being unloved.
The right to life is one of the "unalienable Rights," as the founders of our nation put it. It comes from our Creator, not from human government. It applies to all human beings without regard to:
* Size
* Level of development
* Environment
* Degree of dependency
In 2006, following a series of school shootings, Brian Rohrbough, whose son Danny was murdered at Columbine High School in 1999, said, "This country is in a moral free-fall. For over two generations, the public school system has taught in a moral vacuum, expelling God from the school and from the government, replacing him with evolution, where the strong kill the weak, without moral consequences and life has no inherent value."
He continued, "We teach there are no absolutes, no right or wrong. And I assure you the murder of innocent children is always wrong, including by abortion. Abortion has diminished the value of children."
Since America's first permissive abortion legislation was signed in 1967, 50 million babies have been killed. Each year an additional 1.1 million are slaughtered. As a result of Roe vs. Wade and Doe vs. Bolton, issued in 1973 by five Republican judges and two Democratic judges, the constitutional right to life guaranteed to all persons under the 5th and 14th amendments is being denied to babies during all nine months of pregnancy.
The sanctity of human life and the God-ordained institutions of marriage and family are under attack. It is shame that so few politicians are willing to take a strong, principled stand in their defense. I urge each candidate to examine his or her values and consider the One to whom we owe our existence—the Creator, Life Giver, and Law Giver—the One who says, "Do not murder!" I also urge voters to take note of where candidates stand on the great moral issues of our day.
Morality trumps politics because obedience to God trumps everything.
I specifically spoke of a memo distributed by Duke University which sets forth guidelines for its employees regarding political activities:
http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/2008/09/politicalmemo.html
Further, following the forum I spoke with audience members who thanked me for bringing up this issue and noted that it was important to them.
It is also important to note that this is not the only issue I commented on at the forum. Along with the other candidates I answered questions from the audience regarding volunteer opportunities, home values, and the Council's non-binding marriage resolution, amongst many other issues.
I encourage the Herald Sun to provide more thorough and more accurate coverage in the future of events such as last night's forum.
Allan Polak
Candidate for Durham City Council, Ward III